Gangstalking – possible solutions

In an addition to the previous article, where one moves his/her personality, as a target, out of the “game” by switching it off, there would also be another possible solution when dealing with the gangstalking. While the mentioned approach would require an appropriate understanding of the gnostic principles and the background of the real awakening (defined by Eckhart Tolle as “a shift in consciousness where thinking and awareness separate”; A New Earth, page 259), the 2nd approach would be a sort of a defence at the level of the illusion/matrix. There, we may employ our (‘spiritual’) matrix components, the spirit, soul and mind, to act together in order to provide a sort of a resistance against manipulation we have been exposed to.

So, there we would have a case where an illusionary entity (a personality) fights another illusionary entities (attacking personalities), in order to protect or to improve the quality of its illusionary existence. This could be more practical for those of us who still prefer to enjoy the matrix steaks over the awakening and the associated headaches or for those who want to continue with their warrior role in the forces of light vs forces of darkness battle, including those who just want to reduce hassle they have been exposed to in this heavily controlled reality.

For this defence strategy, some of the mental simulation techniques invented by Italian scientist Dr Corrado Malanga, such as SIMBAD and Flash Dynamic Triade Colour Test, could be helpful, which he designed for dealing with alien and military abductions and interference. As we should not do anything without an understanding of what we were doing, here is an article written by Dr Malanga, explaining the background and main principles of the mental simulations: – LINK

A modified SIMBAD session, which might be helpful at gangstalking cases:

1st Step

Imagination of a TV Studio

Imagine being the anchor(wo)man of a TV talk show. In your mind, make a picture of the studio and the table around which the guests you invited will take their place.

Take some time to imagine the materials and the colours you used to build up the room, the chairs, the furniture. Feel really carefully the warmth that is spread out by the materials you chose to construct the whole room. Imagine their roughness and the temperature that they send out: if you used marble, it will feel colder than wooden surfaces.

Plastic will feel smoother than walls, and so on. Spend some more time just to picture the lights and the noises that are present in this room, which, as a matter of fact, is a TV studio. Be careful not to stumble upon the cables of the cameras which are about to frame you in a moment. Place also a mirror into the TV studio in a certain position, so that all the guests that are going to come in will have to pass in front of it.

2nd Step

Going on air

As soon as you’ re ready to start, go on air: look straight into the camera number 1, which is now turned on, and say something like:

“Ladies and Gentlemen, this evening we’ve a very interesting issue to debate about. The subject of this talk-show’s is: The Gangstalkers And Myself! In order to talk about this, we invited some guests that we’ re about to request to get in. Let’s welcome in my Soul, my Mind and my Spirit.”

Ask now your Soul, Mind and Spirit to come in and look at themselves in the mirror (they should turn around in front of the mirror several times!); be aware that the image reflected by the mirror should be the same as the one you are directly perceiving. If not, that means that your guests have a false identity and they are not what they pretend to.

Suggest them to sit down.

Notice how soul, mind and spirit look like and observe which way they are sitting and if they took place on the chairs you prepared for them. Do not mind which form they could have, just go on with your simulation.

3rd Step

Questions to the Soul, Mind and Spirit

Start by asking your soul to introduce her and ask her if she knows the other two guests.

Do the same with your mind

…and at last, with your spirit.

At this point, ask your soul again if she knows something about the gangstalker issue and ask the other two the same question. The debate can begin. If all three parts don’t agree about something, you can make a big TV screen come down from the ceiling, if it’s not already there, and start the footage of when the gangstalkers came.

4th Step*

Invitation of guests

After the discussion about this video, invite as many gangstalkers and the ones you want to come in and sit around the table, in order to debate with you about the issue. You can also have external interventions by video conference or phone from the ones that couldn’t be there. Your guests will enter the door as you call them by name or by nickname, if you don’t know them, and you can let them sit down where they like to. Imagine the hall, all the micros and chairs. Again, spend some time watching disposition and kind of the TV studio lights. When all of them are comfortably sitting, take a look of how you visualize them: how their form is, how they are dressed, how they relate to one another and how they look like to you who are observing them. Notice the behaviour of any single one of them. There may well be empty chairs or it could be necessary to add some more. Observe their disposition around the table and, just in your mind, notice where every one of them is placed, because later you will be asked to make a sketch which reproduces everyone’s position, with a description of all of them.
As they are all there, ask all of them to rapidly introduce themselves. Remember, you are the anchor(wo)man and they all have to listen to you: if you cut short a discussion, they’ll have to obey. After introducing, you can start with your questions: you can ask anything you want, but your soul should be the first one who answers.

5th Step

First question and discussion

The very first question to be asked should be this one:

“Do you know the guests who sit around this table? Do you know who they are and what they want?

From this obligatory question you can start the discussion, which could be taking place over more sessions (just to not getting too tired).

After this first question, ask all the different characters what they think about the gangstalking problem and ask any single stalker what they are doing here and what are their real interests. Ask them if they’re getting helped by someone, if there are all friends or foes to one another, if they know when their job will be done, etc.: the debate’s role is to determine why they are here and how they relate to your soul, mind and spirit. You can help yourself by watching virtual videos. You can show any footage you need. For instance, should your soul not agree with one other guest, show the “real” footage of the event and discuss them before your guests and let your visitors do the same. The videos have been filmed by your brain and all the data will be delivered by it: they will be about your experiences, that from now on can be seen on the big screen, shot from a camera placed in the best possible position so that you can see everything. Do not be afraid of creating facts that never happened: your mind has recorded everything you lived and knows very well which pictures have to be shown to the guests at your conference.

6th Step

Elimination of gangstalkers

Then ask your soul if she agrees with accepting the presence of the gangstalkers: If she doesn’t, tell her to solve the problem, for example by eliminating the problem. If she agrees, tell her to do it now, live on stage. Visualize your soul at work (but just don’t hurry!), or let her accept the idea of solving the problem any time she thinks it’s appropriate.

If your Soul decides to solve it now, watch carefully the way she looks like while acting through her “Will of doing it”.

7th Step

Never Ever

Now, ask the Soul to declare that she “Never Ever” will accept the presence of gangstalkers.

8th Step

Scanning of body for presence of implants/chips/devices

Ask the Soul to scan the body carefully for presence of any implants/chips/devices and to destroy them.

Check: Head (back of the head, behind the ears, behind the eyes, pineal gland, mouth…); neck; arms/fingers; spine; stomach; genitals; legs
(The soul could be asked about the function of a particular implant and who has placed it there.)

9th Step

Question time.

Ask the Soul and other components anything you want.

10th Step

Integration of the Soul, Mind and Spirit

At the end, ask all components of the being to integrate or ‘fuse’ together… (if the Soul and Spirit do not want to integrate with the Mind, because of perceiving him as “too distorted”, ask them to ‘stick together’ at least and cooperate as much as they could.)

End of session


One needs not to get surprised if he/she perceives some of the “guests” as aliens or military people, as according to Dr Malanga, military personnel has been heavily employed by aliens in the manipulation of the humanity. (One example – LINK; subtitles need to be auto translated from German)

The symptoms of the gangstalking and, so called, hyperdimensional attacks, often overlap to a large extent, especially when strange synchronicities have been involved and one also needs to consider symptoms of schizophrenia, when trying to assess what we were dealing with. Generally speaking, in some pathological cases, a personality, as an important resident of the illusion, can generate various and pretty convincing scenarios in which its illusionary existence gets threatened and then, it would perform real actions to protect itself from those imaginary threats. In fact, most of normal people are doing it pretty often, so the difference between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’, would be only in a degree to which somebody displays a pathological behaviour. This is, probably, because nobody existing in the reality below the line (see the picture below), can not be normal, literally. (Book Operators and Things, by Barbara O’Brien, could also be very helpful in understanding schizophrenia).

This is how the reality would look like, when we look from the gnostic platform.

Here, the concept of the awakening would mean a process of connecting the false (personality) to the real (the Real I) and one can say that without the gangstalking or hyperdimensional attacks, it would be very hard to realise that we were dealing here with an AI, manipulating us through “our” dear personalities/minds, which would also be artificial structures. Of course, this is not to say that the control system is attacking us in order to provide us with an opportunity for awakening. It must keep (adamic) people under pressure as they seem to provide an energy for the (artificial) system, which is dependent on it. However, its sword has two blades.

On the other hand, when the (eastern) gnosis is properly understood, one would realise that most of the personalities would rather prefer (subconsciously) some special status, such as being “TI” or an “alien abductee,” than transferring the control over the physical body to the Real I, and realising its own artificial nature. And, many will be pushed to the edge where it will be just two options left, wake up or perish. And, the problem is, the personality can not wake up per se, as an artificial structure, it can only do that in a cooperation with the Real I. This process can not be faked, because, as long as one feels the pain or fear, that alone would indicate an absence of the connection with the Real part of the being. Fear and pain can only be felt in an absence of the Real I, or the Real Consciousness. Therefore, talking about own awakening while experiencing fear, would mean lying to oneself (we are specialists in it, while many of us have even gained a PhD in lying to oneself discipline).

E.g. in the movie After Earth, the son of Will Smith was pushed by the predator to the edge, where he did not have anything to loose any more. His personality was defeated and it gave up, but not his being. Once he moved from his personality (the unreal) into his being (the real), or once he left his personality with all her emotions and fears, he instantly became invisible to the predator (the unreal). Then, he acted from his being and that action was detrimental to the predator. Prior to that, the kid was told by his father, the following:

“Fear is not real. The only place that fear can exist is in our thoughts of the future. It is a product of our imagination, causing us to fear things that do not at present and may not ever exist. That is near insanity. Do not misunderstand me, danger is very real but fear is a choice.”

So, we may say that the danger we are in is real, however, our thoughts/intellect can not overcome it. Our personalities are designed so to keep us in it, and as such, they are not capable of providing a meaningful resistance to something which they are part of. Only those actions exercised by the human being can do that. Along with that, fear can exist only in our (fake/artificial) minds, on the basis of our (fake) thoughts. And, to our personalities, this concept would be a great riddle, as they can not realise (or almost not), that they are not the ones who are human beings. They just identify themselves with them. And, this as an information, does not mean much to us, as well, because as such, we are in a closed loop system with our source, which is divorced from the objective reality by default, and as such, it regulates our perception and therefore, our thinking and therefore, our behaviour. Our intellectual faculty as a function of the matrix/maya/virtual reality… is not enough to understand the information properly and to apply it. We are in a vicious circle. E.g. Carlos Castaneda could tell us that we were “foreign installations” operated by a “non-organic” (artificial) intelligence (book: Active Side of Infinity), and that a warrior can get rid of its foreign installation by exercising a sort of a discipline… and then… after expelled out of the body, what happens… there is nobody, there, anymore, who will be telling him what to think and what to do… Wait! What!?! It comes out that we, who do all the hard thinking, make proper decisions and behave decently, as much as we could, should finish in a rubbish bin… no wonder that one can not find an internet forum where Castaneda’s followers were having a productive discussion on the topic – how one can read of us, I mean, how we, foreign installations, which read the book, could commit a suicide effectively and efficiently by leaving the physical bodies we have been attached to and we have been in charge of. Or, is there somebody else in our bodies who is supposed to get this information, but we were the first on the receiving end? Anyway, the point is that something like this would not be really fair in regards to us. Especially for those of us who have high IQ, who are smart, who have gained a PhD in the illusion, and not even to mention those of us who claim that they have reached an enlightenment in the illusion?!


While contemplating the above picture, we could say that AI/boss would utilise anthropoids for the task of manipulating the others, because, without human essence or a residue of the Real Consciousness, which has the components like the humanness and conscience, those individuals would be most suitable for the tasks, especially those with psychopathic features (strong drive for control of others and an absence of the feelings like humanness and conscience). So, we would find plenty of them in the intelligence agencies, secret societies, government departments, military, police etc. and, as pretty efficient bio-chemical robots, whatever those individuals would do, consciously or not, it will be directed by and on behalf of the boss/AI. The technological advance has now provided all the necessary infrastructure for the control of the humanity by a few well positioned psychopaths and this is what they do.


Dr Malanga was working on the matrix level, employing subconsciousness of his clients to fight alien/military interference and at his sessions (self induced or guided under hypnosis) it was noted that some victims were entering revenge mode, where they treated some of the ‘guests’ who manipulated them so, by placing them on electrical chairs inside the imagined SIMBAD studio and by pressing the button, treated them by high voltage el. currents (using their soul component as the source of the energy). Allegedly, this was translated onto the material level of the reality by physical destruction of the anthropoids who manipulated them (causing to them strokes and heart attacks) and by a damage of the infrastructure and equipment in the facilities where they were operating from?! However, this type of warfare would not have much impact on the objective reality and would not change the conditions in this reality for ‘better’.

On the other side, adamic people undergoing awakening procedure would have an inner knowing that the manipulators are as real as their own personality is. It could be said that all adamic people in this reality (up to 50% of the population?!) are “TIs” in some way, as they are a source of the energy which they would release when subjected to hardships, suffering, emotional turmoils etc. So, there is a possibility of establishing a point of reference (an “observation deck”) outside of our personality, where from we could watch without a bias, its behaviour, emotions, (mechanical) reactions etc. That “relocation” of the perception point would not be one of those classical dissociations of the personality which it does in order to avoid a pain, but an introspection based on a new awareness. As the connection with our real part of the being strengthens, so we are becoming more and more invisible to the predator (like the kid in the mentioned movie) or to those who are unreal, while our actions would be more and more optimal, because they would be based on the inner knowing, coming from our being which is connected to the Real Consciousness, but not the thoughts, coming from our heads or the (foreign) mind. So, at the end, there would not be anybody/anything to fight, as one can not fight something unreal, if the one is aware enough.

Now, can we understand what was Gurdjieff talking about in the conversation with Ouspensky, somewhere during WWI?

“Have you ever thought about the fact that all peoples themselves are machines?”

“Yes,” I said, “from the strictly scientific point of view all people are machines governed by external influences. But the question is, can the scientific point of view be wholly accepted?”

“Scientific or not scientific is all the same to me,” said G. “I want you to understand what I am saying. Look, all those people you see,” he pointed along the street, “are simply machines—nothing more.”

“I think I understand what you mean,” I said. “And I have often thought how little there is in the world that can stand against this form of mechanization and choose its own path.”

“This is just where you make your greatest mistake,” said G. “You think there is something that chooses its own path, something that can stand against mechanization; you think that not everything is equally mechanical.”

“Why, of course not!” I said. “Art, poetry, thought, are phenomena of quite a different order.”

“Of exactly the same order,” said G. “These activities are just as mechanical as everything else. Men are machines and nothing but mechanical actions can be expected of machines.”

“Very well,” I said. “But are there no people who are not machines?”

“It may be that there are,” said G., “only not those people you see. And you do not know them. That is what I want you to understand.”

I thought it rather strange that he should be so insistent on this point. What he said seemed to me obvious and incontestable. At the same time, I had never liked such short and all-embracing metaphors. They always omitted points of difference. I, on the other hand, had always maintained differences were the most important thing and that in order to understand things it was first necessary to see the points in which they differed. So I felt that it was odd that G. insisted on an idea which seemed to be obvious provided it were not made too absolute and exceptions were admitted.

“People are so unlike one another,” I said. “I do not think it would be possible to bring them all under the same heading. There are savages, there are mechanized people, there are intellectual people, there are geniuses.”

“Quite right,” said G., “people are very unlike one another, but the real difference between people you do not know and cannot see. The difference of which you speak simply does not exist. This must be understood. All the people you see, all the people you know, all the people you may get to know, are machines, actual machines working solely under the power of external influences, as you yourself said. Machines they are born and machines they die. How do savages and intellectuals come into this? Even now, at this very moment, while we are talking, several millions of machines are trying to annihilate one another. What is the difference between them? Where are the savages and where are the intellectuals? They are all alike . . .”


He [the man] is a machine, everything with him happens. He cannot stop the flow of his thoughts, he cannot control his imagination, his emotions, his attention. He lives in a subjective world of ‘I love,’ ‘I do not love,’ ‘I like,’ ‘I do not like,’ ‘I want,’ ‘I do not want,’ that is, of what he thinks he likes, of what he thinks he does not like, of what he thinks he wants, of what he thinks he does not want. He does not see the real world. The real world is hidden from him by the wall of imagination. He lives in sleep. He is asleep. What is called ‘clear consciousness’ is sleep and a far more dangerous sleep than sleep at night in bed.


All that men say, all that they do, they say and do in sleep. All this can have no value whatever. Only awakening and what leads to awakening has a value in reality.

(from the book In the Search of the Miraculous, P.D. Ouspensky)


Of course, if what Gurdjieff said above was the Truth, then even many of those who regard themselves as truthseekers, would not like to know it. They would prefer to look for the truth elsewhere. As the term “machine” may sound offensive, maybe we should use a bit more modern terminology, like John Keel used, 40 years ago, (book: The Cosmic Question of the Eighth Tower) in order to describe us and the situation we are in:

”You and I are biochemical robots controlled by the powerful radiations being broadcast from the Eighth Tower [supercomputer]. Our brains are programmed like computers, and many of us are suddenly and completely reprogrammed at some point in our adult life.


All of our beads are wired to a central switchboard [supercomputer]. That switchboard is the only God and the only reality. Illusions and delusions are piped down from it to further confound our perception of reality.”


The machine/biochemical robot is the target and prone to a manipulation. So, in order not to be manipulated, we need to overcome our machine/robot state and become real human beings.



Gangstalking defence

It is easy to stop all external attacks on our personalities inc. so called, “gangstalking”, if one has a basic awareness of the objective reality. So, the one only needs to became aware that his/her personality is non-objective or non-existent in the objective reality. Or, our personalities are as much objective, as objective would be the non-objective reality/illusion/maya/stereoma/the matrix/the virtual reality, we are currently inhabiting.

Therefore, in such an environment, those non-objective entities (“bad guys”) which keep attacking and manipulating us (the “good guys”) living in an illusion, could be dealt with pretty easily. As a personality (inc. those which have gained a PhD in the illusion) is a non-objective entity, it can not affect the objective reality, whatever it thinks or does. So, when under an attack in the illusion/matrix, all one needs to do is to switch off his/her personality, from time to time or, whenever necessary. Just stop the thoughts or stop taking your thoughts seriously if you can not stop them. A non-objective entity can not have objectively true thoughts, anyway. Once we move our attention to the moment we are in (the future and the past do not exist, anyway, whil ethe resent moment is all that is), while being aware of ourselves and our environment, but not thinking, we are entering the objective reality. An “inner knowing” related to the moment we are in, may appear and that would be all what we need. And, later, an understanding may arise that whoever is objective, would not perceive those non-objective entities as a threat. He/she may not perceive them at all, anymore. And, anyway, how an illusionary entity could attack somebody who is true or objective? No way.